No. This is very wrong. The whole design is inappropriate for an
‘inverse sandwich’. That would require half the fish above the bread
and half below. What we’ve got is a loaf of bread with a hole in it and
a fish pushed through. It’s a fish sandwich… nothing ‘inverse’ about it.
By Andy 24 September, 2004 - 07:49
Yes, I see your point about the requirement for a horizontal aspect of the sandwich theory, but there is a line of thought that the bread loaf is actually a part of the fish, forming the central section of it’s body, and would not, should it be dissected, reveal a normally formed fish within. The only way to understand this natural phenomena is by inspection of a specimen. (Pisces Micaparsus).
By RadRafe 27 September, 2004 - 20:17
Yeah, I like Kittyloaf too. Thing is, I like a differentKittyloaf. Actually, that one bears a striking resemblance to the marvellous breadfish…
By oli 9 March, 2005 - 22:01
Wtf does he say? Hes like an inverse sandwich.. or a fisha nd then a sharks 0.0?also it is an inverse sandwich cuz if u think its head and its tail are the two loaves of bread and the bread is the fish then whala inverted.
By Tyris 3 October, 2005 - 13:10
You sure it isn’t “instant” sandwich? I know I thought it was “motherless breadfish” at first…
By Raz 20 September, 2004 - 23:52
I think kitty loaf is cooler. http://kittyloaf.cjb.net/
By Andy 21 September, 2004 - 08:18
He’s like an Inverse Sandwich!
By Doreen 23 September, 2004 - 17:55
No. This is very wrong. The whole design is inappropriate for an
‘inverse sandwich’. That would require half the fish above the bread
and half below. What we’ve got is a loaf of bread with a hole in it and
a fish pushed through. It’s a fish sandwich… nothing ‘inverse’ about it.
By Andy 24 September, 2004 - 07:49
Yes, I see your point about the requirement for a horizontal aspect of the sandwich theory, but there is a line of thought that the bread loaf is actually a part of the fish, forming the central section of it’s body, and would not, should it be dissected, reveal a normally formed fish within. The only way to understand this natural phenomena is by inspection of a specimen. (Pisces Micaparsus).
By RadRafe 27 September, 2004 - 20:17
Yeah, I like Kittyloaf too. Thing is, I like a different Kittyloaf. Actually, that one bears a striking resemblance to the marvellous breadfish…
By oli 9 March, 2005 - 22:01
Wtf does he say? Hes like an inverse sandwich.. or a fisha nd then a sharks 0.0?also it is an inverse sandwich cuz if u think its head and its tail are the two loaves of bread and the bread is the fish then whala inverted.
By Tyris 3 October, 2005 - 13:10
You sure it isn’t “instant” sandwich? I know I thought it was “motherless breadfish” at first…
By Scatman Dan 3 October, 2005 - 15:16
I’m certain it’s “marvellous”, based on things written on the author’s web site.
Could be “instant”. That’d make more sense.
By Anonymous 16 December, 2006 - 21:37
Yes, it was swimming in the ocean waters. It was like an instant sandwich for fishermen and sharks!
By Scatman Dan 17 December, 2006 - 00:09
Well that helps clear that up… and only a year and a quarter late…