Comments on: Reasons To Tick The “It’s Complicated” Box http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/ Scatman Dan's stuff Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:43:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha hourly 1 By: jimmy http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2346 jimmy Fri, 30 May 2008 08:35:01 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2346 The first thing that came into my head when I heard was the phrase "tuning fork of death". You have my permission to use it. The first thing that came into my head when I heard was the phrase “tuning fork of death”. You have my permission to use it.

]]> By: The Pacifist http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2345 The Pacifist Thu, 29 May 2008 16:27:56 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2345 Agreed. Squares are traditionally more masculine than circles. Although in French they're both masculine - except where circle means orbit or square means plaza. Then they're feminine. Fun, huh? Agreed. Squares are traditionally more masculine than circles. Although in French they’re both masculine – except where circle means orbit or square means plaza. Then they’re feminine. Fun, huh?

]]> By: Katie http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2344 Katie Thu, 29 May 2008 13:20:24 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2344 Just to be awkward, I saw you and JTA as the diamonds. Just to be awkward, I saw you and JTA as the diamonds.

]]> By: feebeestar http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2343 feebeestar Thu, 29 May 2008 12:31:56 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2343 i am the opposite and see you as the circle, i don't know why, but i can't see it the other way around either i am the opposite and see you as the circle, i don’t know why, but i can’t see it the other way around either

]]> By: Ruth http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2342 Ruth Thu, 29 May 2008 12:26:27 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2342 I don't see the squares or the circles as representing anyone, particularly, they're just placeholders for the structure. Even with the comments above, I still just see shapes. It's probably my lack of imagination. I don’t see the squares or the circles as representing anyone, particularly, they’re just placeholders for the structure. Even with the comments above, I still just see shapes.

It’s probably my lack of imagination.

]]> By: Strokeyadam http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2341 Strokeyadam Thu, 29 May 2008 10:56:07 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2341 I also thought of you and JTA as the squares. I think it has something to do with corners making the shape look more masculine than the circle. Although I've never met a man that has corners so that's probably rubbish I also thought of you and JTA as the squares.
I think it has something to do with corners making the shape look more masculine than the circle. Although I’ve never met a man that has corners so that’s probably rubbish

]]> By: Matt In The Hat http://www.scatmania.org/2008/05/29/reasons-to-tick-the-its-complicated-box/#comment-2340 Matt In The Hat Thu, 29 May 2008 10:45:24 +0000 http://blog.scatmania.org/?p=1343#comment-2340 You and JTA are the squares, though I'm afraid a bad case for your theory as my reason for thinking that is it correlates with the positions you occupied when I drew my diagram after I found out. You and JTA are the squares, though I’m afraid a bad case for your theory as my reason for thinking that is it correlates with the positions you occupied when I drew my diagram after I found out.

]]>